The Roomba 692 and 675 are two of iRobot’s most popular budget-friendly robot vacuums. Both offer dependable cleaning performance at an affordable price, but subtle differences in design, app features, and capabilities might sway your decision. This detailed comparison will guide you in selecting the best model for your home.
Design and Build Quality
Subtle Style Differences
Both models share the same compact and functional design, but the Roomba 692 adds a touch of modern aesthetics.
| Feature | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 13.4 x 3.5 inches | 13.4 x 3.5 inches |
| Weight | 6.8 lbs | 6.8 lbs |
| Finish | Glossy Black with Silver Accents | Matte Black |
The 692’s sleek glossy finish offers a slightly more contemporary look, while the 675 sticks to a more understated matte black design.
Cleaning Performance
Comparable Suction Power
Both models deliver the same level of suction, ideal for light to moderate cleaning tasks.
| Cleaning Aspect | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | Standard | Standard |
| Brush System | Dual Multi-Surface Brushes | Dual Multi-Surface Brushes |
Performance Across Surfaces
| Surface Type | Roomba 692 Performance | Roomba 675 Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Hardwood Floors | Good | Good |
| Low-Pile Carpets | Fair | Fair |
| High-Pile Carpets | Poor | Poor |
Both models are effective on hard floors and low-pile carpets, but neither is ideal for deep cleaning or thick rugs.
Navigation and Mapping
Basic Random Navigation
The Roomba 692 and 675 use iRobot’s entry-level navigation system, cleaning randomly rather than methodically.
| Navigation Feature | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation System | Standard Random Path | Standard Random Path |
| Smart Mapping | No | No |
| Obstacle Avoidance | Basic | Basic |
Both models are best suited for smaller, uncomplicated spaces, as they lack advanced mapping capabilities.
Battery Life and Runtime
Identical Battery Performance
Both vacuums offer the same runtime, enough for small to medium spaces.
| Battery Aspect | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime | ~90 minutes | ~90 minutes |
| Recharge and Resume | No | No |
Neither model supports “recharge and resume,” meaning they won’t automatically continue cleaning after recharging.
Smart Features
Enhanced App Functionality in the 692
While both models are Wi-Fi-enabled and compatible with the iRobot Home App, the 692 includes personalized cleaning recommendations.
| Feature | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi Compatibility | Yes | Yes |
| App Control | Enhanced | Basic |
| Voice Commands | Alexa/Google | Alexa/Google |
The 692’s ability to provide cleaning suggestions based on usage patterns adds a layer of convenience not found in the 675.
Accessories Included
Identical Packages
Both models come with the same standard accessories, keeping maintenance simple and cost-effective.
| Accessory | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Spare Filter | No | No |
| Virtual Wall Barrier | No | No |
Neither model includes premium accessories like Virtual Wall Barriers or spare filters.
Price and Value
| Aspect | Roomba 692 | Roomba 675 |
|---|---|---|
| Price Range | Slightly Higher | Lower |
| Value for Money | Excellent | Good |
The 692 typically costs slightly more but justifies the higher price with its modern app features and sleek design.
Who Should Choose Which?
| User Type | Recommended Model |
|---|---|
| Budget-Conscious | Roomba 675 |
| Tech-Savvy Users | Roomba 692 |
| Small Homes | Both |
| Light Cleaning Needs | Both |
Final Verdict
The Roomba 692 and 675 share many similarities, making them both excellent choices for first-time robot vacuum buyers.
- Choose the Roomba 675 if you’re looking for an affordable, no-frills robot vacuum for simple cleaning needs.
- Opt for the Roomba 692 if you want modern app features, cleaning recommendations, and a sleeker design for a modest price increase.
Both models reflect iRobot’s reputation for quality and reliability, ensuring you’ll get dependable performance regardless of your choice.