The Roomba 675 and 694 are two affordable models in iRobot’s lineup, designed for users seeking simplicity and convenience. At first glance, they seem nearly identical, but slight differences in design, features, and performance might sway your decision. This in-depth comparison will clarify which model better suits your needs.
Design and Build Quality
Subtle Aesthetic Differences
Both the 675 and 694 share the same circular design, but their finishes set them apart.
Feature | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions | 13.4 x 3.5 inches | 13.4 x 3.5 inches |
Weight | 6.8 lbs | 6.8 lbs |
Finish | Matte Black | Glossy Black with Silver Accents |
The 694’s glossy black finish with silver accents gives it a more modern appearance, while the 675 opts for a classic matte look.
Cleaning Performance
Similar Suction Power
Both models feature the same suction power and cleaning system, making their performance nearly identical.
Cleaning Aspect | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Suction Power | Standard | Standard |
Brush System | Dual Multi-Surface Brushes | Dual Multi-Surface Brushes |
Performance Across Surfaces
Surface Type | Roomba 675 Performance | Roomba 694 Performance |
---|---|---|
Hardwood Floors | Good | Good |
Low-Pile Carpets | Fair | Fair |
High-Pile Carpets | Poor | Poor |
Both models handle hard floors and light debris effectively but struggle with deep carpet cleaning due to their entry-level suction capabilities.
Navigation and Mapping
Basic Navigation Systems
The 675 and 694 both rely on iRobot’s adaptive random navigation system, ideal for small spaces without complex layouts.
Navigation Feature | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Navigation System | Standard Random Path | Standard Random Path |
Smart Mapping | No | No |
Obstacle Avoidance | Basic | Basic |
Neither model offers advanced mapping or obstacle avoidance, making them best suited for uncluttered rooms.
Battery Life and Runtime
Comparable Battery Performance
Both vacuums deliver similar runtime and charging features, sufficient for small to medium-sized homes.
Battery Aspect | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Runtime | ~90 minutes | ~90 minutes |
Recharge and Resume | No | No |
While the runtime is the same, neither model supports a “recharge and resume” function, so they won’t continue cleaning after recharging.
Smart Features
Enhanced App Experience on the 694
While both models are Wi-Fi-enabled and compatible with the iRobot Home App, the 694 includes newer app updates, offering a slightly more user-friendly experience.
Feature | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Wi-Fi Compatibility | Yes | Yes |
App Control | Yes | Enhanced |
Voice Commands | Alexa/Google | Alexa/Google |
The 694 benefits from iRobot’s latest app updates, including personalized cleaning suggestions based on usage patterns.
Accessories Included
Minimal Accessories
Both models include basic accessories, but neither comes with advanced items like a Virtual Wall Barrier.
Accessory | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Spare Filter | No | No |
Virtual Wall Barrier | No | No |
Accessories are identical, focusing on simplicity and low maintenance.
Price and Value
Slightly Different Price Points
The 694 is typically priced slightly higher due to its updated design and app features.
Aspect | Roomba 675 | Roomba 694 |
---|---|---|
Price Range | Lower | Slightly Higher |
Value for Money | Good | Very Good |
If you’re looking for the best value with enhanced app functionality, the 694 edges ahead.
Who Should Choose Which?
User Type | Recommended Model |
---|---|
Budget-Conscious | Roomba 675 |
Small Homes | Both |
Tech-Savvy Users | Roomba 694 |
Simplistic Needs | Roomba 675 |
Final Verdict
The Roomba 675 and 694 cater to budget-friendly buyers who value simplicity and ease of use.
- Choose the Roomba 675 if you’re looking for a dependable and straightforward robot vacuum at the lowest possible price.
- Opt for the Roomba 694 if you prefer a more modern design and enjoy the convenience of enhanced app features.
Both models deliver reliable cleaning performance, making them excellent choices for light cleaning tasks in small spaces.